Note: The online Request to Speak window has expired.
The online Comment window has expired
Agenda Item
17 20-6131 An Ordinance of the City of Key West, Florida amending the Future Land Use Map of the City of Key West Comprehensive Plan for properties located at - 918 Fort Street (RE # 00001630-000801), 727 Fort Street (RE # 00013990-000000), 101 Geraldine Street (RE # 00013970-000000), 709 Fort Street (RE # 00013960-000000), 100 Angela Street (RE # 00013950-000000), 105 Geraldine Street (RE # 00013910-000000), 110 Angela Street (RE # 00013900-000000), 111 Geraldine Street (RE # 00013870-000000), 112 Angela Street (RE # 00013860-000000), 109 Geraldine Street (RE # 00013830-000000), and 114 Angela Street (RE # 00013820-000000); Amending the Future Land Use Map Legend from Historic Public / Semi-Public, Historic Commercial, and Historic Residential to Historic Commercial; and to add a new Future Land Use Map Zoning Subdistrict designation of "Historic Neighborhood Commercial Bahama Village Truman Waterfront" (HNC-4) and applying such designation to said properties; Pursuant to Chapter 90, Article VI, Division 3 of the Land Development Regulations of the Code Of Ordinances of the City Of Key West, Florida; Providing for severability; providing for the repeal of inconsistent provisions; Providing for transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency; Providing for the filing with the Secretary Of State and for an effective date; and Providing for the inclusion into The City Of Key West Comprehensive Plan.
With changes; Comments on Items #17, #18, #19, & #20; Comments are based on extensive public input from many citizens at 11/5 BVRAC Meeting; Though proposed zoning allows mixed use, there is concern whether mixed use with sufficient numbers of units reserved for the highest need (low/very low income categories) was actually possible; suggestion to partner with AHI and seek tax credit funding to expedite development timing/maximize number of low/very low units; most input concluded 30% of units reserved for affordable housing is not sufficient (should be higher %) and most ,if not all, of the affordable housing be restricted to the low/very low categories; continued under item 18
With changes; Comments on Items #17, #18, #19, & #20; Comments are based on extensive public input from many citizens at 11/5 BVRAC Meeting; Though proposed zoning allows mixed use, there is concern whether mixed use with sufficient numbers of units reserved for the highest need (low/very low income categories) was actually possible; suggestion to partner with AHI and seek tax credit funding to expedite development timing/maximize number of low/very low units; most input concluded 30% of units reserved for affordable housing is not sufficient (should be higher %) and most ,if not all, of the affordable housing be restricted to the low/very low categories; continued under item 18